Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Taradevi Ratanlal Bafna (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Taradevi Ratanlal Bafna (ITAT Pune) Tribunal Quashes Re-assessment: Approval by PCIT Instead of Principal Chief Commissioner Held Invalid Assessee, an individual, filed her return of income on 26.02.2021 declaring total income of ₹93.17 crore. The case was originally assessed u/s 143(3). Later, AO received information from the Investigation Wing that Assessee had allegedly received bogus accommodation entries of ₹27.21 lakh as LTCG, claimed exemption u/s 10(38) of ₹1.10 crore & had unverified bank credits of ₹7.68 crore. On this basis, notice u/s 148A(b) was issued on 30.03...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930