This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 69A not invocable as Cash Deposit Sources duly maintained: ITAT Ahmedabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dipak Balubhai Patel (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Dipak Balubhai Patel (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Ahmedabad held that invocation of provisions of section 69A of the Income Tax Act unjustified as cash deposits during demonetization period duly recorded in books of account and source of cash deposits duly maintained.
Facts- The assessee is a Karta of HUF. During scrutiny assessment, AO found that the assessee in his Account with Bank of Baroda deposited a sum of Rs.10,75,000/- during demonetization period. AO rejected the Books of Accounts by stating on the verification of the Return of Income filed for the A.Y. 2016-17...
Author Info
