Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Shri Anilkumar G. Darji (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08 & 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO Vs Shri Anilkumar G. Darji (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Sub-clause (iii) of section 271(1)(c) provides mechanism for quantification of penalty. It contemplates that the assessee would be directed to pay a sum in addition to taxes, if any, payable him, which shall not be less than but which shall not exceed three times the amount of tax sought to be evaded by reason of concealment of income and furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. In other words, the quantification of the penalty is depended upon addition made to the incom

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31