This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere Entering into Development Agreement doesn’t Allow Section 45(2) Invocation: ITAT Jaipur
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Man Prakash Talkies Pvt Ltd. (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Man Prakash Talkies Pvt Ltd. (ITAT Jaipur)
ITAT Jaipur held that mere entering into the Development Agreement would not permit invocation of section 45(2) of the Income Tax Act. There is no positive act which indicates that the assessee has treated capital asset as stock-in-trade.
Facts- Revenue has preferred the present appeal mainly on the ground that whether CIT(A) is right in quashing the reopening proceedings of AO ignoring the fact that the assessee has converted its capital reopening proceedings of AO ignoring the fact that the assessee has converted its capital asset into stock...





