Case Law Details
Sponsored
In Re. The Timken Company (AAR)
The assessee, a foreign company, without a presence or PE in India, earned long-term capital gains which were exempt u/s 10(38). The assessee applied for a ruling on whether it was liable to pay Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB on the said gains. HELD ruling in favour of the assessee:
(i) In P.No. 14 of 1997 (234 ITR 335) the AAR held that s. 115JA (akin to s. 115JB) applied to every “company” and as the term “company” was defined
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.