Laconic order deleting Penalty passed by CIT(A) was invalid

ACIT Vs Kapu Gems E-Tower Centre (ITAT Mumbai)

The Assessing Officer concluded that the TPO has called for specific details pertaining to segmental profitability between AE and non-AE segments within the meaning of section 92D(3) of the income tax Act, 1961. The details were called for during transfer pricing proceedings and assessee was given opportunity to submit the same but the same was not furnished within 30 days or even till passing of transfer pricing order or at any time subsequently. The details were essential for

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.