Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anup Kumar Vs JCIT (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anup Kumar Vs JCIT (Karnataka High Court) The Karnataka High Court quashed a penalty notice & order issued u/s 271DA for alleged violation of Section 269ST, holding that the initiation of penalty was time-barred in light of the binding ruling in PCIT v. K. Umesh Shetty [2025] 170 Taxmann.com 748 (Karnataka). Background The Petitioner challenged: Notice u/s 271DA dated 06.10.2024, Penalty order u/s 271DA dated 28.03.2025, & Notice of demand u/s 156 dated 28.03.2025, all issued by the JCIT, Central Range, Mangaluru for A.Y. 2022-23. The contention was that the penalty proceedings were ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930