This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Just because creditors/share applicants could not be found at address given, it would not give Revenue the right to invoke section 68
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs. Dwarkadhish Investment (P.) Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DECIDED BY: HIGH COURT OF DELHI,
IN THE CASE OF: CIT Vs. Dwarkadhish Investment (P.) Ltd.,
APPEAL NO: ITA 911/2010,
DECIDED ON August 2, 2010
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J
CM 12293/2010 in ITA 911/2010
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM 12294/2010 in ITA 911/2010 & CM 12296/2010 in ITA 913/2010
For the reasons stated in the applications, delay in re-filing the appeals is condoned.
Applications stand disposed of.
ITA 911/2010 & ITA 913/2010
1. The present appeals have been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity “Act, 1961”) challenging...
