Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suken Suresh Mehta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suken Suresh Mehta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) JDA Exchange Has a Cost — ITAT Allows Indexed Cost on Land & Constructed Area Rights The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2022-23, holding that capital gains arising from a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) cannot be computed by denying the indexed cost of acquisition, both in respect of undivided land and the constructed area received in exchange. The assessee had acquired land in 1981 and entered into a JDA in 2013, under which 45% of undivided land was given to the developer in excha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930