Case Law Details
Sunil Pran Sikand Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court)
In the recent case of Sunil Pran Sikand Vs ACIT before the Bombay High Court, a crucial question arose regarding the tax treatment of income derived from subsequent development grants. This case sheds light on the intricate balance between categorizing such income as long-term capital gains or income from other sources.
Background: The case revolves around a development agreement dated 29th September 1992, involving Sunil Pran Sikand and his sons, pertaining to a property in Khar, Mumbai. Under this agreement, a developer committed to pay a certain amount per square foot for Transferable Development Rights (TDR) to be utilized for additional construction on the said property.
Key Issues Raised: The primary contention centered on whether the income received from the developer upon the utilization of TDR should be considered as Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) or income from other sources. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) initially ruled in favor of treating the amount as income from other sources, disputing the nature of the agreement and the enforceable rights of the parties involved.
Court’s Ruling: However, the Bombay High Court took a different stance. It examined the development agreement alongside the commitment letter issued by the developer, considering them as integral parts of a single agreement. The Court emphasized that the payment made by the developer was essentially consideration for the developmental rights envisaged in the original agreement.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
