Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : HDFC Bank Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court)
Appeal Number : Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1375 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/06/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

HDFC Bank Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court)

HC dismisses application to Quash FIR filed against a HDFC Bank Manager for allowing a Customer to Operate Bank  Locker despite receiving  prohibitory order under section 132(3) of the Income Tax Act to put a stop operation on the Bank accounts, fixed deposits and Bank lockers of that Customer.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF PATNA HIGH COURT

The petitioner has filed the instant application for quashing of the First Information Report of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case no. 549 of 2021 registered under sections 420, 409, 406, 462, 206, 217, 201, 34, 120B and 37 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case based on the written statement dated 20.11.2021 of Smt. Priyanka Sharma (respondent no. 5), Deputy Director of Income Tax (Inv), Unit-2(2), Guwahati addressed to the SHO, Gandhi Maidan Thana, Patna alleges inter alia that in course of search and seizure conducted on 5.10.2021 at 3rd floor, Khataruka Niwas, South Gandhi Maidan, Patna in the case of Smt. Sunil Khemka, Smt. Sunita Khemka and Smt. Shivani Khemka, order under section 132(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was served by the Authorised Officer to the HDFC Bank, Exhibition Road Branch, Patna to put a stop operation on the Bank accounts, fixed deposits and Bank lockers of the assessee. It was stated that it was found that the assessee Smt. Sunita Khemka holds a Bank locker in the HDFC Bank, Exhibition Road Branch, Patna and hence a prohibitory order under section 132(3) of the Income Tax Act was imposed in the Bank locker no. 462 held in her name. It is further stated that it came to light that the restraint order imposed has been breached and violated and that Smt. Sunita Khemka operated the Bank locker no. 462 on 9.11.2021 at 11.53 a.m.. The said fact was validated by the CCTV footage and in the said operation of the locker Smt. Sunita Khemka was aided by the HDFC Bank, Exhibition Road Branch, Patna. Smt. Sunita Khemka in her statement on oath agreed that she had operated her Bank locker no. 462 on 9.11.2021 and that she was assisted by the Bank officials. The statements of Smt. Abha Sinha, Bank Manager, Abhishek Kumar, Branch Operational Manager, Deepak Kumar, Teller Banker Authoriser, all of HDFC Bank, Exhibition Road Branch, Patna was recorded on oath and they agreed that the Bank locker no. 462 was operated on 9.11.2021. Contravention of the order under section 132(3) is punishable under section 275A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and also punishable under sections 34, 120B, 201, 204, 206, 117, 406, 409, 420, 426 and 462 of the Indian Penal Code. Thus, it was stated that Smt. Sunita Khemka in connivance with the HDFC Bank operated the Bank locker without government authorization / permission and thus it was requested that an FIR be filed and suitable action be initiated.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031