Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Reeta Goel (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Reeta Goel (ITAT Delhi) Only Embedded Profit Element Taxable: ITAT Delhi Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition to 12.5% – Sales Accepted, So Purchases Can’t Be Fully Disbelieved These cross appeals by Assessee & Revenue arose from NFAC Delhi order dated 16.07.2024 in assessment u/s 143(3) for AY 2021-22. AO had disallowed entire purchases of ₹23.50 Cr treating them as bogus u/s 69C, since suppliers did not respond to notices & were not produced. CIT(A) held that source of expenditure was explained through bank statements & invoices, sales were not doubted, and therefor...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031