Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : JM Financial Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CA Sandeep Kanoi

For the year under consideration the assessee has specifically raised a point before the AO that 97.82% of the investment is in the subsidiary companies and joint venture companies and, therefore, no expenditure was incurred for maintaining the portfolio on these investments or for holding the same. The assessee has also pointed out that these investments are long term investment and no decision is required in making the investment or disinvestment on regular basis because these investments are

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No adverse GST Order Without Personal Hearing: Allahabad HC Canara Bank Wins ITAT Appeal: Section 115JB Not Applicable Bombay HC Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Section 144C(13) Deadline Section 115JB not applicable to banking companies: ITAT Bangalore Bombay HC Criticizes ITAT for Delayed Order, Restores Rectification Plea View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930