Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Theeta Chowdayya Nagarathna Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Theeta Chowdayya Nagarathna Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Remand Directed as Assessee Was Not Given Proper Opportunity; Cash Deposit During Demonetisation to Be Re-examined In this appeal, Assessee challenged the order of Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Visakhapatnam, confirming addition of ₹14,32,500/- as unexplained money u/s 69A arising from cash deposits made during the demonetisation period. The limited-scrutiny assessment was completed u/s 143(3) examining cash deposits, wherein AO rejected Assessee’s explanation that deposits were sourced from husband’s agricultural income & an unsecured loan from...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930