Case Law Details
Case Name : ACIT Vs. Dinesh K. Mehta (HUF) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2005- 2006
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
If all speculative transactions will be claimed as hedging transactions, very purpose behind the provisions of section 73 not permitting set off of speculative loss against business income will become redundant.
CASE LAWS DETAILS
DECIDED BY: ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH `D’, IN THE CASE OF: ACIT Vs. Dinesh K. Mehta (HUF), APPEAL NO: ITA No. 976/Mum/2009, DECIDED ON April 30, 2010
ORDER
PER N.V. VASUDEVAN, JM :-
This is an appeal by the revenue against the order dated 28.11.2008 of learned CIT(A)-XII, Mumbai for A.Y. 2005-06.
2. Ground No.1 raised by the revenue reads as follows ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

