Case Law Details
Case Name : Rashmikant Baxi (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA Sandeep Kanoi
issue before us is whether Assessing Officer was justified in applying the provisions of Section55A(b)(ii) of the Act at relevant point of time. As stated above, during the year assessee shown land situated at Rajkot, Gujarat for Rs. 1,27,00,000/- and derived long term capital gain, which was invested in new residential house of exemption u/s.54F of the Act. The land sold during the year was purchased prior to 1st April, 1981. Therefore, long term capital gain was calculated by adopting fair market value of land as on 1st April, 1981 as per the provisions of section 55(2)(b)(i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

