Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Arulmigu Madhurakaliamman Temple (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Arulmigu Madhurakaliamman Temple (ITAT Chennai) Ancient Temple Not Taxed on Technicalities- Delay in Registration & Return Filing No Bar- ITAT Chennai Upholds Exemption u/s 11 Chennai ITAT dismissed Revenue’s appeal & upheld the order of CIT(A) granting benefit of exemption u/s 11 to the Assessee-temple, despite delay in obtaining registration u/s 12AA & non-filing of the return in time. The Assessee, a temple carrying on religious activities for over 1000 years, had not filed its return for AY 2017-18. During demonetisation, it deposited cash of ₹45.70 lakh. The AO comp...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930