Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Purushotamdas Goenka Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Purushotamdas Goenka Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) We find that in this case ,three properties owned by the assessee in Amritsar namely Madanmohan Malviya Road, Amritsar, Punjab, property at Moonlight Building, Katra Ahluwalia and Ramkin Joint property at MM Malviya Road, Amritsar remained vacant throughout the year though the same were let out in A.Y. 2015-16. We find that assessee has let out these properties in the subsequent year and accordingly offered the rental income to tax. Now the issue before us is whether the deemed rent of the assessee has to be taken as annual value (ALV) under section 2...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930