Addition u/s. 68 sustained as source of credit not properly explained: ITAT Surat

Shailesh Chandak (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

ITAT Surat held that since the assessee failed to properly explain the source of credit it can safely be concluded that shares were penny stocks with sole purpose to route unaccounted money in the grab of share profit hence addition under section 68 sustained.

Facts- The

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.