Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shailesh Chandak (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shailesh Chandak (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

ITAT Surat held that since the assessee failed to properly explain the source of credit it can safely be concluded that shares were penny stocks with sole purpose to route unaccounted money in the grab of share profit hence addition under section 68 sustained.

Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny. It was found that the assessee had sold shares of Nouvea Global Ventures Ltd. (NGVL) amounting to Rs.3,64,478/-, Pearl Agricultural Ltd. (PAL) amounting to Rs.21,02,213/- and Pearl Electronics Ltd. (PE

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930