Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Precision Camshafts Limited Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Precision Camshafts Limited Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Pune) Corporate Guarantee Fee Cannot Be Imputed When Bank Prohibits Charging; Ad-Hoc Interest Mark-Up Also Unsustainable – TP Additions Deleted by Pune Tribunal Tribunal noted that the Bank of Baroda loan agreement expressly prohibited the Assessee from charging any guarantee commission to its Netherlands subsidiary. Following its own order for AY 2020-21, Tribunal held that when a third-party bank itself bars charging fees, the ALP cannot be anything other than NIL, making the TPO’s 0.5% adjustment unsustainable. On the protective addit...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930