Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Concept Communication Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2800/Mum/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/11/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Concept Communication Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Conclusion – Addition cannot be made merely on the basis of the statement unless the same is supported by the documentary evidence. Statement recorded Under Section 133A of Income Tax Act, 1961 under fear/ coercion cannot be relied upon by the AO if it is not corroborated by documentary evidence. AO is bound to give the assessee an opportunity to  controvert evidence and cross examine the evidence on which department places reliance. A failure in opportunity to  cross examine can result in the order being a nullity. 

Facts –

Assessee is engaged in the business of advertising agency. Assessee engages vendors to undertake the campaign service on his behalf. The work done by the vendor is verified by the client and after verification, the payment is done to the assessee, who in turn disburses the amount to the vendor as agreed between them.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031