Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pawan M. Shah Vs ITO 23(2)(5) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pawan M. Shah Vs ITO 23(2)(5) (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that merely because the assessee couldn’t explain the balance amount of Rs. 8,57,000 mentioned in computation of income and return, the same cannot be added to the total income. Addition not sustainable on the basis of typographical error. Facts- During the course of assessment proceedings, it was observed that during FY 2013 – 14 the assessee has sold residential flat at Bandra for the total consideration of Rs. 1,00,20,000. The said property was jointly owned by the assessee and her son. Upon verification of the return filed by...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930