Case Law Details
Case Name : ACIT Vs Katrina (Kaif) RoAsstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ms. Katrina Rosemary Turcotte (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07semary Turcotte (ITAT Mumbai)
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah
Addition made on the basis of a print out taken from the computer of a third party without there being no other corroborative evidence brought on record to prove the fact that the payment mentioned in the seized material was actually received by the assessee, not sustainable.
Recently, in ACIT vs. Katrina Rosemary Turcotte [ITA Nos. 3092/Mum./2015 to 3097/Mum./2015, decided on 11.10.2017], appeals by the Revenue were directed against separate orders passed by the CIT(Appeals), for the assessment years 2006–07, 2007–08, 2008–09, 2009–10, 2010–11 and 2011â€...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

