Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tenet Networks Private Ltd. Vs Gst Council And 3 Others (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Tax No. - 361 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tenet Networks Private Ltd. Vs Gst Council And 3 Others (Allahabad High Court)

HC directs GST Council to consider granting extended time period for filing appeal for order passed under Section 129 and 130 of CGST Act

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Tenet Network (P.) Ltd v. GST Council [Writ Tax No. 361 of 2024 dated March 13, 2024] directed the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) to take into consideration the submission made by the Petitioner that the benefit of Notification No. 53/2023-Central Tax dated November 02, 2023 for extended time period for filing of appeal for orders passed under Section 73 and 74 of the CGST Act, should also be extended to orders passed under Section 129 and 130 of the CGST Act.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

1. Heard Sri Shubham Agarwal, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Gaurav Mahajan, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.4.

2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that a notification has been issued bearing No.53/2023-Central Tax by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Ministry of Finance, dated November 2, 2023, wherein the time to file appeal under sub-section (1) of Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) has been extended till January 31, 2024. He however, submits that this notification only deals with the orders passed under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act and does not take into account the orders passed under Sections 129 and 130 of the Act.

3. Shubham Agarwal, has argued that it is highly discriminatory as this notification deals only with the orders passed under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act and does not look into the penalty provisions under Sections 129 and 130 of the Act. He submits that these sections should have also been included in the said notification and this lacuna should be looked into by the Government.

4. Upon due consideration, I am of the view that this Court is not in a position to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Central Government to include Sections 129 and 130 of the Act in the said notification. However, I am of the view that the Government can very well consider adding these two Sections in the said notification, so that the benefit that has been provided for the orders passed under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act can be extended to Sections 129 and 130 of the Act.

5. In the light of the above, GST council and the Central Board of Indirect Taxes, Ministry of Finance, is directed to look into this aspect of the matter at the earliest.

6. The matter is adjourned sine die with liberty granted to the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner to mention the same at the appropriate time.

7. In the meantime, affidavits be exchanged between the parties.

8. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to inform about this order in the office of the learned A.S.G.I.

*******

(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728