Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Enzyme Business Center (GST AAR Karnataka)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 33/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/11/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Enzyme Business Center (GST AAR Karnataka)

Explore GST ruling on damages in Enzyme Business Center case. Key insights on classification, GST rate, and implications for lease agreements.

Introduction: The recent GST Advance Ruling in the case of Enzyme Business Center sheds light on the taxation of damages received from a tenant for the early termination of a sub-lease before the agreed lock-in period. This article delves into the key questions addressed by the ruling, including the classification, GST rate, and the implications of such transactions.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Nature of Transaction: The primary question revolves around whether the damages received by the applicant, totaling Rs. 1,85,00,000, amount to a supply under Section 7 of the Central GST Act, 2017. The ruling affirms that such damages do constitute a supply, considering the breach of contract due to the early termination of the sub-lease.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031