S.P.P. Silks Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
In the case of S.P.P. Silks vs. State Tax Officer, the Madras High Court addressed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29.12.2023. The order stemmed from an audit of the petitioner’s books of account, during which the petitioner raised objections to the audit observations. However, these objections were not accepted, leading to the issuance of an intimation in Form GST DRC-01 on 20.09.2023, followed by a show cause notice dated 29.09.2023. The impugned order was subsequently issued on 29.12.2023.
The petitioner contended that the language used in both the intimation and the show cause notice was identical, suggesting predetermination. Citing the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ORYX Fisheries (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, the petitioner argued that proceedings pursuant to a show cause notice that did not afford a reasonable opportunity to respond were liable to be interfered with. Furthermore, the petitioner highlighted that the conclusions recorded in the impugned order mirrored those in the show cause notice and earlier audit observations.
In response, the learned Additional Government Pleader contended that the petitioner had not enclosed necessary documents while objecting to the audit objections or responding to the show cause notice, leading to the confirmation of the tax proposal.
