Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Simran Chandwani Vs Principal Commissioner of CGST (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 8164/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/10/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Simran Chandwani Vs Principal Commissioner of CGST, Delhi North And Ors. (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court held that denial of refund claim of accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to inverted duty structure merely because of incorrect classification of goods by the supplier is unjustified and unsustainable in law.

Facts-

The petitioner is engaged in the business of selling footwear which is chargeable to goods and services tax at the rate of 5% or 12%, depending on whether the price of the footwear is below Rs. 1,000/- or above Rs. 1,000/-. One of the components used in manufacturing of footwear is PVC straps, which is chargeable to goods and services tax at the rate of 18%.

In view of the said inverted duty structure, the petitioner filed an application for refund of ITC aggregating Rs. 5,47,894/-. The respondents issued an acknowledgment acknowledging the said application. Thereafter, the respondents issued the show cause notice calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why her refund claim should not be rejected.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031