Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

The Clarification of Input Tax Credit Under Ex-Works Contracts: A New Chapter in GST Compliance

In a significant move that resonates particularly with the automobile sector and beyond, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has addressed a crucial aspect of Input Tax Credit (ITC) through its Circular No. 241/35/2024-GST, dt: 31-12-2024. This comprehensive clarification focuses on the availability of ITC under Ex-Works contracts, marking a pivotal shift in how businesses can claim Input Tax Credits (ITC) in their supply chain operations.

2. The journey of this clarification begins with the automobile sector, where a unique relationship exists between Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and their dealers across the supply chain Pan India. To understand the concept more clearly, let us imagine a bustling OEM facility in Chennai, where newly manufactured vehicles stand ready for dispatch. Under the traditional Ex-Works (EXW) contract with their dealers, these vehicles enter a fascinating phase of transition right of ownership which happens at the factory gates, long before they physically reach their destination dealerships across India.

3. The chronicle unfolds at the OEM’s factory gate, where a significant transformation occurs in terms of property rights and responsibilities. When a vehicle is handed over to a transporter, multiple elements come into play simultaneously. The ownership transfers to the dealer, the OEM’s delivery obligations conclude, and most importantly, the dealer assumes responsibility over the goods and its journey ahead. This moment of transition of the right of ownership has been at the heart of all the complex debate regarding Input Tax Credit availability in the hands of such dealers.

4. Let us consider the practical implications of this arrangement on Tax compliance. A dealer in Mumbai, eagerly awaiting their stock of vehicles, has traditionally faced a dilemma. While they’ve already assumed ownership and risk at the Chennai factory gate, some tax authorities have insisted they wait until the vehicles physically arrive at their Mumbai showroom before claiming ITC because of the applicability conditions under Section 16(2)(b) of the CGST Act 2017.

Section 16(2) (b) goes like this.

Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no registered person shall be entitled to the credit of any input tax in respect of any supply of goods or services or both to him unless,-

(a) he is in possession of a tax invoice or debit note issued by a supplier registered under this Act, or such other tax paying documents as may be prescribed;

(b) he has received the goods or services or both.

The disconnect between commercial reality and tax compliance treatment has created significant challenges for businesses, affecting their working capital management and of course the operational efficiency. However, explanation to clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of the CGST Act provides that

the goods would be deemed to have been “received” by the registered person for the purpose of this clause, where:

a) the goods are delivered by the supplier to a recipient or to any other person on the direction of such registered person, whether acting as an agent or otherwise; 

b)such direction may be given before or during movement of goods; and

c) the goods may be delivered either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise.

5. This CBIC’s clarification through its Circular No. 241/35/2024-GST, dt: 31-12-2024 brings a refreshing perspective to this scenario. Unlike its predecessor, the Central Excise regime, which demanded physical receipt at the manufacturer’s factory for CENVAT credit, the GST framework takes a more nuanced approach. The circular emphasizes that Section 16(2)(b) of the CGST Act 2017 doesn’t specify a particular location for “receiving” goods but only insist on receipt by the recipient of Supply. This interpretation better aligns with modern business practices and the dynamic nature of supply chains. The concept of “deemed receipt” in such situations though not defined in as many terms, plays a crucial role in this new understanding. When goods are delivered to any person under the registered person’s direction, whether through document transfer or other means, it constitutes “a receipt” for ITC purposes. This interpretation brings significant relief to businesses operating under Ex-Works contracts.

6. The implications of this clarification extend far beyond the automotive sector too. Consider a textile manufacturer in Surat delivering goods to a Chennai-based retailer under an Ex-Works contract basis. The same principles apply – the moment goods are handed over to the transporter at the Surat facility, at the behest of the buyer, the property rights are transferred and documented, the Chennai retailer becomes eligible for ITC. This broader application makes the circular’s impact particularly far-reaching and progressive also. However, the circular hasn’t overlooked necessary safeguards. The clarification maintains a strong link between ITC availability and business purpose. The fundamental condition remains unchanged – goods must be used or intended for business purposes only. This requirement acts as a crucial check against potential misuse of the tax credit system.

7. Notwithstanding that, the circular also addresses various scenarios where ITC benefits might need a reversal. If goods are diverted for non-business purposes, whether during transit or after physical receipt, the ITC benefit must be reversed. Similarly, if goods are lost, stolen, destroyed, written off, or given away as gifts or samples, the tax credit benefit cannot be retained. These provisions ensure that the tax benefit remains firmly tied to legitimate business activities.

8. The impact of this broader interpretation of deemed receipt has far reaching advantages. For businesses, particularly in the automobile sector, this clarification brings multiple advantages. The immediate benefit is improved working capital management through ITC availability. The Dealers no longer need to wait for physical receipt of goods to claim their tax credits, provided other conditions under Sections 16 and 17 of the CGST Act 2017 are scrupulously met. This timing advantage can significantly impact cash flow management, especially for businesses dealing with high-value goods. The clarification also reduces the compliance burden by eliminating the need to track physical receipt for ITC purposes. Instead, businesses can focus on maintaining proper documentation of the transfer of ownership at the supplier’s premises.

9. This shift aligns tax treatment with commercial realities, making compliance more straightforward and logical means. From an accounting perspective, the circular provides clear guidance on when ITC can be claimed. The timing now aligns with the transfer of property rights and risks, rather than physical movement of goods. This alignment helps businesses maintain more accurate and timely records of their input tax credits as provided by the law. The crucial point is that Documentation becomes decisive – maintaining clear records of when and how goods are handed over at the supplier’s premises, tracking transport arrangements, and documenting insurance responsibilities will play key role. While the clarification provides welcome relief, it also emphasizes the importance of robust record-keeping track to substantiate ITC claims.

10. Looking ahead, this CBIC’s clarification marks a significant milestone and demonstrates how tax administration can adapt to business realities while maintaining necessary safeguards against misuse. The circular establishes the tax administration’s responsiveness to industry concerns while ensuring that the fundamental principles of GST remain protected. This understanding paves the way for more business-friendly tax administration while maintaining necessary controls against misuse. By aligning tax treatment with business realities, it makes compliance more straightforward while maintaining necessary safeguards. As businesses adapt to these changes, they can look forward to more efficient tax credit management and improved working capital efficiency at the same time, improved operational efficiency, ultimately contributing to the ease of doing business in India.

Sponsored

Author Bio

The Author is the recipient of the prestigious "Presidential Award-2019" for meritorious and specially distinguished record of Service from the Government of India. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Gujarat HC’s Landmark Judgment on GST Levy for Assignment of Leasehold Rights Understanding Treatment of Vouchers under GST: New Perspective New GST Clarification on Place of Supply for Online Services Clarification that Simplified Input Tax Credit Rules for E-Commerce Operators An in-depth Analysis of recommendations of 55th GST Council meeting View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31