Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that unjust enrichment is not applicable to refund consequent upon finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Facts- The issue relates to refund of duty paid on After-Sales Services, Pre-Delivery Inspection charges, Automobile Cess. It has been argued that the claim of refund is hit by the bar of unjust enrichment and therefore the Commissioner (Appeals) ought not to have held that the respondent is eligible for refund of duty paid on these charges on finaliza...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930