Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Clearance of goods to a SEZ unit would not amount to export for the purposes of Rule 5 of CENVAT Rules

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2010 taxguru.in 573
Case Name
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. The Tiger Steel Engineering (I) Pvt Ltd (CESTAT Mumbai)
Advertisement

Brief: Tiger Steel Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. (the assessee) is registered with Central Excise Department for the manufacture of pre- fabricated steel buildings, falling under Chapter 94 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The assessee also avails of the CENVAT credit facility under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CENVAT Rules). From 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2008, the assessee cleared its finished goods, namely, pre- fabricated building without payment of Central Excise duty to a unit located in Special Economic Zone (SEZ) under a letter of undertaking. These goods so cleared to SEZ without payment of duty were regarded as exports and accordingly, the assessee filed six refund claims in respect of the unutilized CENVAT credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Rules.

The refund claims filed by the assessee were rejected by the Original Adjudicating authority and on appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals), the order of the Adjudicating authority was set aside by concluding that the supplies to SEZ units amount to exports for the purpose of Rule 5 of CENVAT Rules. The Department has filed the present appeal against the said order to the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

Citation: CESTAT decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-I Vs. The Tiger Steel Engineering (I) Pvt Ltd (2010-TIOL-1256-CESTAT-MUM)

Court: CESTAT, Mumbai

Contentions of the Assessee

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.