Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rohit Surfactant Pvt Ltd Vs CGST, C.C & C.E. (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/50972/2018-SMC
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/09/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rohit Surfactant Pvt Ltd Vs CGST, C.C & C.E- UJJAIN (CESTAT Delhi)

It is seen that the Cenvat Credits have been disallowed by the lower authority, vide the impugned order, by observing that the services fall within the exclusion category specified in Rule 2 (I) (C). This exclusion clause disallows the Cenvat Credit in respect of certain specified services such as Membership of Club, Life Insurance etc when such services are used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee. Upon perusal of some of the sample invoices furnished by the Ld. Consultant, it is seen that services such as membership of club is not for the personal benefit of any employee, but are for pursuing the business activities of the appellant. For example, such services include membership of Indian Home & Personal Care Industry Association, Foreign Exchange Information Service etc. With reference to Life Insurance Service, it is noted that the appellant is under a statutory obligation to provide group insurance scheme in their factory for the benefit of the employees. This cannot be said to be for the personal benefit of the employees. With reference to Air Travel Agent’s Service, the said services have been availed by the officials of the appellant in regard to their business.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT JUDGMENT

1. The issue involved in these four appeals is identical and hence these appeals are decided through this common order. These appeals cover the disputed period from April, 2011 till June, 2015. The appellant has several manufacturing units situated at different parts of the county and are engaged in the manufacture of soap and detergent. Their Head-office has registration as ISD, for the purpose of distributing the credit on input services availed centrally, to various manufacturing units. The present dispute is in connection with the distribution of such service tax credit in respect of the following services:-

i. Club or Association Service.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031