This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Responsibility under regulation 10(n) doesn’t mandate customs broker to keep continuous surveillance on client
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sai Chhaya Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sai Chhaya Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Delhi held that responsibility of the Customs Broker under Regulation 10(n) does not include keeping a continuous surveillance on the client to ensure that he continues to operate from that address and has not changed his operations.
Facts- Directorate General of Analytics and Risk Management of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs analysed the data and identified risky exporters involved in execution of frauds and got verification done by the jurisdictional GST officers and identified exporters who could no...
Author Info
