Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nabisha Leathers Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 40290/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/02/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Nabisha Leathers Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai held that minor deficiency in the processing may not ipso facto make the leather as not fully finished. Accordingly, satisfying the conditions contained in Public Notice No. 21/2009-14 dated 01.12.2009, the same is freely exportable.

Facts- M/s. Nabisha Leathers (appellant) filed a Shipping Bill No. 4090836 dated 16.03.2010 for export of 37 cartons of “Goat Shoe Suede Upper Leather” of four different colours. However, the Appraising Officer (Leather Expert) opined that the item declared as “Goat Shoe Suede Upper Leather” of grey colour packed in 13 cartons might not be satisfying the norms prescribed for finished leather vide DGFT Public Notice No. 21/2009-14 dated 01.12.2009.

It may be mentioned here that only finished leather of all kinds which conform to the conditions contained in the Public Notice No. 21/2009-14 dated 01.12.2009, are freely exportable and all others are restricted for export requiring a valid export license issued by DGFT authorities. As per Export Tariff (S. No. 14) of Schedule II of Customs Tariff Act, 1975, “Hides, skins and leathers, tanned or un-tanned, all sorts”, but not including manufactures of leathers, attract an export duty of 60%. Further, only finished leathers are eligible for drawback.

On the basis of the CLRI report that the exported leather was not conforming to the definition of finished leather, after due process of adjudication, the consignment was confiscated valued at Rs. 6,08,578/- (FOB) u/s. 113 (d) of the Customs Act, 1962. As the consignment was allowed for export on the basis of an undertaking bond, the exporter was allowed redemption on payment of fine of Rs. 50,000/-. Further, export duty of Rs. 3,65,149/- was demanded and a penalty of Rs.10,000/- was imposed on the exporter. The First Appellate Authority has upheld this order and hence the appellant came in appeal before us.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031