Babu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court) In Babu Khan v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. there were a total of 121 Writ Petitions filed by the Liquor Vendors seeking waivers on the annual guarantee fee and tax relief for the second wave time period of COVID-19. In the case, the Petitioners contended […]
Maruti Castings, Proprietor Nand Kumar Sharma Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Prima facie it cannot be said that in case of a registered person action only under Section 35(6) read with Section 73 or 74 of the Act can be taken and that Section 67 of the Act cannot be invoked, if the […]
Harshvardhan Chhajed & Others V. DGIT & Others (Rajasthan High Court) Seizure under Income Tax has to be conducted after due care and caution. Merely on account of reasons to suspect, seizure of goods ought not to be undertaken. In fact the investigation wing has to show reason to believe that a person is carrying […]
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner moved an application in terms of Section 144B 7(vii) seeking an opportunity of personal hearing which has been denied. Learned counsel submits that fair opportunity has not been provided to put up their submissions and defence and the order goes beyond the contents of the show cause notice.
current petition has been filed against the notices issued by Dy. Commissioner (State Tax) Circle – Anti Evasion & Anr. (Respondent) which treated the beverage ‘Appy Fizz’ as a non-alcoholic beverage under the heading of 2202 99 90 making it liable to 18% Goods and Services Tax (GST).
This bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner deserves to be dismissed; for the reasons, firstly, the petitioner failed to appear before the Department while notices were issued to him, secondly, even after filing of complaint before the learned Trial court, he remained absconded for about one year and thirdly, the petitioner is a chartered accountant, who is master mind of the crime and he has created 38 fake firms and availed ITC wrongfully to the tune of 6,36,32,492/-.
It was also argued that the respondent Assessing Officer has also committed an error in giving only four days’ time to the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice.
Aravali Shikshan Avum Anusandhan Sansthan Vs National E-Assessment Centre & Others (Rajasthan High Court) Aravali Shikshan Avum Anusandhan Sansthan (“the Petitioner”), has filed the current writ petition against the order passed by the National Faceless Assessment Center under Section 144-B along with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”) imposing Additional […]
Manoj Vijay Sh. Prahalad Vijay Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench) The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in Complaint File No. IV(06) 40/AE/JPR/2021 for offence under Section 132 of the Central Goods And Services Tax Act, 2017 (for brevity, “the Act of […]
Govt of India Vs Mewar Textiles And Ors (Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur Bench) The instant application has been filed by the applicant who is an unsecured creditor and seeks claim of settling subsequent claim to be winding up in accordance with law alongwith interest on the belated payment. The Official Liquidator present in the Court […]
