ACIT Vs North American Coal Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune) A careful perusal of the ITSC direction explicitly indicates that the AO shall compute the tax payable ‘after giving credit for taxes already paid by the applicant’. `Taxes already paid’ do not mean only the taxes directly paid by the assessee but also those […]
Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Aero Traders Pvt. Ltd. has held that no penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act can be imposed when income is determined on estimate basis.
BYK Asia Pacific Pte. Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) On going through the documents/material as discussed above, it is evident that Seminar expenses, Training expenses, Printing expenses and Staff welfare expenses are amounts paid by the Indian BO to the Singapore HO, which satisfy the twin conditions of `reimbursement’ as discussed supra, viz., one-to-one direct […]
ACIT Vs Gajalaxmi Steel Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune) There is no dispute on the fact that the Assessing Officer made addition based on the estimation with reference to the consumption of electricity. the Assessing Officer had made the addition of Rs 7,65,23,877 on the basis of wrong presumption/ assumptions. I find it quite baffling that […]
DCIT Vs Force Motors Ltd. (ITAT Pune) During the First Appellate Proceedings before the Ld. CIT(Appeals), it was submitted by the assessee that payments were made to technical consultants from Japan, Germany and Italy. The assessee submitted that these consultants are not residents of India and further their stay in India was less than the […]
Piaggio Vehicles Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Whether education cess can be allowed as deduction? The Ld. Senior Counsel for the assessee has placed strong reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Sesa Goa Limited Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, (2020) 107 CCH 0376 MumHC, Tax […]
Section 273B states that wherever there is a reasonable cause in not complying with the requirements resulting into imposition of penalty including section 271(1)(b) under consideration, the penalty needs to be deleted.
Amount of income which qualifies for deduction is the profits of the business of the undertaking and not any income earned by assessee de hors the business of the undertaking. If the relevant items of income are held to be falling under the head `Income from other sources’, the same will not qualify for deduction under sectio 10A, 10AA.
Bapujibuwa Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit VS JCIT (ITAT Pune) The expression ‘reasonable cause’ has to be considered pragmatically and if the facts of the present case are examined keeping this legislative spirit in mind, we find that there were enough circumstances to show that the assessee company had acquired bona-fide belief that its activities […]
Nortonlifelock Inc. Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT held that income earned by the assessee from sale of software, either directly to the customers in India or through distributors or resellers constitutes its business income and not the Royalty income and as such business income is not taxable in India as the assessee did not have […]
