Dr. Mathew Cherian Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) Facts of the Case: 1. There was a survey in Kovai Medical Centre and Hospital (in short KMCH or hospital) by the officials of the Income Tax Department, on 11.2021. In the course of the survey, various documents were found and seized that, according to the respondents, […]
Madras High Court directed the petitioner to submit an additional reply to the Show Cause Notice issued under section 174 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017.
Madras High Court held that assessment order passed without considering important submission by the petitioner is a non-speaking order and against the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, the assessment order is quashed and remanded back for fresh consideration.
K Ponmudi Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order on the following grounds: a) Despite several requests made by the petitioner to the respondents, requesting them to furnish the evidence based on which they have found that M/s. SRS Mining is alleged to have paid Rs.20,00,000/- as illegal payments […]
HC quashed assessment order and consequential recovery notice issued by Revenue Department on the grounds that no opportunity of hearing was afforded to assessee and contentions of assessee were also not considered, thus same was a violation of principles of natural justice.
Madras High Court held that provisions of section 174(2) of the CGST Act states that repeal as per subsection (1) shall not affect any rights, privileges or obligations or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under the old Act.
Madras High Court without expressing any opinion on merit, in the case of detention of Supari imported from Thailand, Court directed submission of an application under section 110-A of the Customs Act, 1962 for provisional release of goods.
Madras High Court held that rejection of application u/s 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 for release of confiscated goods on payment of redemption fine justified as the rejection was based on sound reasons.
Madras High Court held that it is well settled now that carry forward of unadjusted VAT TDS (TNVAT Act) to GST is duly allowed in terms of Section 140 of the TNGST Act, 2017.
Madras High Court held that detention of goods for mere non-mentioning of GSTN of the recipient under Bill to – Ship to transaction, without intention to avoid tax, is unjustified.
