Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Isha Exim Vs Commissioner of Customs (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. Nos. 34569, 34575, 34576, 34579, 34582 & 34584 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/02/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Isha Exim Vs Commissioner of Customs (Madras High Court)

Madras High Court without expressing any opinion on merit, in the case of detention of Supari imported from Thailand, Court directed submission of an application under section 110-A of the Customs Act, 1962 for provisional release of goods.

Facts-

The petitioner has imported Supari from Thailand. According to the respondents, they are prohibited goods, whereas the petitioner categorically contends that they are not. According to the petitioner, as per the Advance Ruling dated 07.08.2015 in respect of M/s Excellant Betelnut Products Pvt Ltd., Nagpur, the subject goods namely Supari will fall under Chapter 21 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and therefore, they are not prohibited goods.

The petitioner categorically contended that the product Supari does not contain Lime, Katha (catechu) and Tobacco and also does not contain any other ingredients such as Cardamom, Copra or Menthol. Hence according to the petitioner, the product Supari will fall only under Chapter 21 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and they are not prohibited goods for import.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031