Madras High Court set aside the impugned order as it was based on one basis that writ petitioner’s case is not covered under instruction no. 1914 dated 02.12.1993.
Shapoorji Pallonji Solar Holdings Private Limited Vs ITO (Madras High Court) Writ Petition- Remedy Under Article 226 of Constitution of The India Constitutes An Extraordinary Remedy Assessee challenged the assessment order mainly on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice urging the point that the order had travelled beyond the scope of show-cause […]
HC held that, in case of non constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal, petitioner can file a Writ Petition before High Court.
K.Chiranjeevi Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) The Central Information Commission (in short ‘CIC’) in the case of Shir Milap Choraria V. Central Board of Direct Taxes (Appeal No.CIC/AT/2008/00628 dated 15.06.2009), was concerned with the request for disclosure of income tax returns and financials of a third party, and at paragraph 12, the Bench […]
Tvl. Rising International Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court) M/s.Rising International Company (legal name, Kailashkumar), Madurai, the petitioner herein, is a dealer registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act. It imports toys from China. It also purchases goods from Delhi-based dealers. The dealer’s specific stand is that returns […]
Madras High Court held that complaint against petitioner presuming culpability on his part for failing to pay the tax is not a base for the criminal case.
Madras High Court, in the case of revocation of Input Tax Credit, directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority by way of statutory appeals within a period of three weeks
Madras High Court directed to deal with the matter of disallowance of ITC on account of mismatch between returns filed by the petitioners and returns filed by purchasing/ selling third party dealers as per Circular No. 5 of 2021 dated 24.02.2021
Errors committed are clearly inadvertent and, rectification would, in fact, enable proper reporting of turnover and input tax credit to enable claims to be made in an appropriate fashion by petitioner and connected assessees.
Madras High Court held that section 125 is a residuary provision and as there are three specific non-compliances qua statutory requirements, penalty u/s. 125 of Rs. 25,000 each can be invoked for such non-compliances.
