Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Madras High Court

Opportunity of heard will be granted after payment of 25% of disputed tax as notices were not complied

December 19, 2024 291 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court held that due to non-compliance with notice issued under GST, the petitioner is required to deposit 25% of disputed tax and post deposit of amount, the petitioner will be granted an opportunity of being heard.

Directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax for failure to reply GST notice and attended hearing

December 19, 2024 798 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court held that order confirming demand due to mismatch between returns under GST set aside with condition to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount since petitioner neither replied to DRC-01 and neither attended personal hearing.

GST Order passed due to non-appearance set aside with condition to deposit 25% of disputed tax

December 19, 2024 297 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court set aside order passed in respect of excess claim of input tax credit, due to non-appearance on the part of petitioner, with the condition to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount. Directed to grant opportunity of being heard on payment of required amount.

Stay granted on payment of 10% of tax demand since department failed to furnish appropriate proof of alleged demand

December 18, 2024 390 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court granted stay on payment of 10% of tax demand since the respondent/ department failed to furnish proof against alleged demand. Accordingly, order set aside and stay granted.

Input tax credit to be paid back on cancellation of dealer’s registration if evidence of sale not furnished

December 18, 2024 567 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court held that input tax credit availed and utilised is required to be repaid back on cancellation of registration in case was no evidence of sale. Accordingly, order set aside and remitted back to the file of AO.

Due to non-compliance with GST notice, petitioner asked to deposit 25% of disputed tax

December 18, 2024 66 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court held that since petitioner failed to comply with notice issued in Form DRC-01, the matter will restore back to the file of AO provided petitioner deposits 25% of disputed tax amount.

Employer must provide PF benefits to individuals defined as ’employees’ under Section 2(f) of EPF Act: HC

December 18, 2024 417 Views 0 comment Print

Tamil Nadu Grama Bank challenges EPF assessment order in Madras HC, claiming exemption based on its own pension scheme under the Employees’ Provident Funds Act.

Granting third personal hearing mandatory when specifically sought: Madras HC

December 18, 2024 120 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court held that granting third hearing mandatory when petitioner has specifically sought for the same. Order set aside and matter remanded back since third hearing not granted.

Madras HC granted final opportunity to defend their case on payment of 25% disputed tax

December 18, 2024 93 Views 0 comment Print

During the relevant period, the petitioner filed its return and paid the appropriate taxes. While scrutinizing the petitioner’s monthly return, it was noticed that there was mismatch between GSTR-01 and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A/2B.

Non-access to GST portal resulted into non-response to GST notice hence directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax

December 17, 2024 129 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court held that assessee is directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount since the assessee was unable to access GST portal and respond to the notice issued. Accordingly, appeal disposed of.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728