Karnataka High Court rules Section 263 cannot be invoked solely due to the absence of a DVO report, if best judgment assessment was an option.
Karnataka High Court held that total consideration under composition scheme doesn’t include amount received from customer towards land. Thus, consideration for works contract under composition Scheme of KVAT doesn’t include receipt for land cost.
Karnataka High Court allows ESOP discount as deductible expense under Section 37 for Biocon Ltd. Revenue’s appeal dismissed for AY 2004–05.
Karnataka High Court held that entertainment tax and service tax are independent of each other. Thus, for the purpose of levy of entertainment tax, the ‘amount received or receivable’ cannot include service tax component.
Karnataka HC rules solatium for metro land acquisition as compensation under CGST Act, not subject to GST. Details on court’s reasoning and legal provisions.
Karnataka High Court held that forcible recovery during course of search or investigation is contrary to law and hence liable to be refunded back. Thus, writ appeal dismissed as devoid of merit.
Karnataka High Court sets aside GST order against Balaji Packaging, allowing reconsideration under Section 73 to avail Amnesty Scheme benefits.
Karnataka HC rules single tax ‘satisfaction note’ invalid for multiple years. Separate notes required under Section 153C, impacting tax assessments.
Karnataka High Court held that blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger by invoking Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 [CGST Rules] without granting pre-decisional hearing and without stating cogent reason in order is impermissible in law.
Karnataka High Court held that during re-assessment proceedings, claim for Input Tax Credit can be rectified under section 39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, even when the same is disadvantageous to the State Exchequer.
