We do not agree with the reasons given by the AO for the simple reason that when survey team was noticed unaccounted purchases & unaccounted sales and also difference has been treated as unaccounted income of the assessee, then question of making further additions towards unaccounted purchases does not arise. Moreover, it is only net result of unaccounted purchases & unaccounted sales, needs to be taxed.
Sardarmal Kothari Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT held that when an assessment has been made under sec.143(3) and not under sec.144 of the I.T. Act, it means that subsequent compliance in the assessment proceedings was considered as good compliance and the defaults committed earlier were ignored by the Assessing Officer and, therefore, there is no […]
ITAT held that first of all the assessee has offered this in assessment year 2007-08, it cannot be added again and moreover, this being highly contentious issue and debatable whether this is to be assessed in assessment year 2007- 08 or 2009-10, it cannot be rectified while acting u/s.154 of the Act.
ITAT Chennai held that levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act alleging furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income unsustainable as the matter is highly debatable.
ITAT Chennai held that it is not open for the Assessing Officer to travel beyond the reasons for selection of the scrutiny for limited scrutiny.
ITAT held that if advances received by the assessee from customers on which TDS Credits has been claimed, has been offered as income of subsequent financial years, then the same needs to be recognized as income as and when such income accrues to the assessee.
ITAT Chennai held that before concluding with regard to applicability of provisions of section 195 of the Income Tax Act, all necessary and relevant documents like cost sharing agreement/ auditor’s report/ other evidences need to be examined thoroughly. Accordingly, matter set aside with direction to AO to re-examine the claim.
ITAT Mumbai held that activity of running tuition centres can be considered as undertaken for charitable purpose under relief of the poor only if the same is proved with necessary evidence.
ITAT held that payment of Fees for training to Employees on soft skill & general topics cannot be treated as Fees for Technical Services (FTS)
ITAT Chennai held that disallowance u/s 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act sustainable as aggregate of the payments made to a single party otherwise by an account payee cheque drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft exceeds Rs.20,000/-in a day.
