Whether interest on delayed GST payment as per section 50 of CGST Act, 2017 can be levied on gross tax liability instead of net liability?
S. Raheja Realty Pvt. Ltd. Vs Office of Income Tax Officer (Gujarat High Court) On perusal of the Explanation (1) of the Section 148, it is clear that that for the purpose of Section 148A, the information with the Assessing Officer which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment means any information […]
Bharat Gordhandas Patel Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) HC allows bail for GST related offence on deposit of Rs. 10 Lakh in Six Instalments and held that even on allegations of grave economic offence, it is not a rule that bail should be denied in every case and whether bail is granted or […]
Yogeshbhai Naginbhai Vora Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The only question that falls for consideration of this Court is whether the police custody / remand of the petitioner – accused can be ordered by the Court pending adjudication and in an interregnum time, when the initial period of 15 days is over? The […]
Unique Infra Space Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) All the captioned petitions constitute a group and what the petitioners have prayed is to direct the respondent authorities to permit the petitioners to file ‘Form GST Tran-I’ to enable the petitioners to claim the carried forward eligible duties of CENVAT/Input Tax Credit […]
Prayagraj Dyeing And Printing Mills Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Heard learned advocate Mr. Anand Nainawati for the petitioner, learned advocate Mr. Utkarsh Sharma for the Union of India and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya for the respondent State and its authorities. 2. The petitioner M/s. Prayagraj Dyeing and […]
Aarti Industries Limited Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) The petitioner wants to file ‘Form GST Tran-I’ to enable the petitioner to claim the carried forward eligible duties of CENVAT/ Input Tax Credit on account of Service Tax, Central Excise and Gujarat Value Added Tax on the appointed day i.e 30.6.2017 in terms of […]
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court while dismissing the Writ Petition under Article 226 held that Notice issued by Bank under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 cannot be challenged by invoking Writ jurisdiction as effective alternate remedy has been provided under Section 17 of the Act.
Company cannot decide disputed question of right & title, ownership or right of occupancy has no nexus with grant of electrical connection
Held that application u/s 11(6) for appointment of an arbitrator after the period of cause of action got extinguished is not maintainable
