An in-depth analysis of the case Sofitra Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) regarding violations of Section 269SS and 269T of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi confirms addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act due to the failure to prove creditor creditworthiness & transaction genuineness in Prestigious Enterprises Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT.
Learn about the ITAT Delhi ruling in Amrik Sokhi vs. ITO for A.Y. 2015-16, where the claim of capital gain deduction u/s 54 is restored for verification. Details here.
The Delhi ITAT has upheld the addition relating to bogus accommodation entries and unexplained commission expenditure in the A and R Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. case for AY 2009-10.
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Delhi’s decision to dismiss a reopening based on a change of opinion in the case of ITO Vs Sant Singh.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment framed u/s. 153A of the Income Tax Act based on material found during search on third party without following the mandate of section 153C of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable in law.
Property renovation cannot be disallowed merely for the reason that no telephone number, VAT/TIN number has been mentioned in the bill and there is no charges of VAT levied in the bill
ITAT Delhi rules in favor of Narendra Kumar Gupta, stating that books of account and vouchers are not required in a 44AD return, deleting additions u/s 69A.
ITAT Delhi’s decision in the case of Grand Venezia Commercial Towers Pvt. Ltd. regarding hearings notice sent to wrong address. Detailed analysis and conclusion.
ITAT Delhi rules in favor of a Canadian resident, allowing them to benefit from the India-Canada Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). Learn more in this article.
