Delhi High Court mandates reassessment in Praveen Bansal vs ITO, emphasizing fair hearing and verification of claims under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi HC in Merlin Facilities Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India, held that impugned order of provisional attachment of bank accounts under CGST Act becomes non-operative post statutory period of one year.
Delhi High Court quashes the penalty order issued under Black Money Act, citing the department’s failure to consider assessee’s email.
Delhi High Court orders reevaluation in Upinder Kumar Wanchoo vs ITO, stressing fair hearing and document review under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that department cannot ignore an order passed by the appellate authority merely stating that it proposes to file an appeal against the said order.
Delhi High Court held that order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act without dealing with the request for accommodation and according without hearing the petitioner is in violation of principles of nature justice and hence liable to be set aside.
Delhi High Court held that the award can be regarded as enforceable only if it is actually executable. Accordingly, the Final Partial Award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal is unenforceable award.
Delhi High Court directed to commence construction of Chamber Block of Sales Tax Bar Association being delayed for the last more than 15 years.
Delhi High Court held that the applicant filing declaration under SVLDR Scheme cannot quantify the amount since it was the prerogative of the Department to quantify the amount.
Delhi High Court held that penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act on overseas supplier duly imposable as alleged offences have been committed within the territory of India.
