Sponsored
    Follow Us:

CESTAT Mumbai

Bill of Entry can be modified to correct clerical error in Quantity

March 4, 2022 20010 Views 0 comment Print

Surya Roshni Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT held that Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 provides for making amendment to the Bill of Entry. As per the same, the Bill of Entry could have been modified by the Revenue authorities to correct the clerical error made by the appellant under self-assessment […]

Interactive intelligent panel Having CPU cannot be classified as Monitors

February 4, 2022 1653 Views 0 comment Print

Cloudwalker Streaming Technologies Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai) In valuation, rejection of the declared amount is a pre-requisite because the relevant Rules afford consequential alternatives but rejection of declared classification at the outset carries the burden of saddling the exercise with re-classification that may not meet the test of General Rules for […]

Revenue is bound by SION norms fixed by Ministry of Commerce

January 28, 2022 2046 Views 0 comment Print

GKB Vision Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (NS-V) (CESTAT Mumbai) The twin issues that required consideration in this case are that as to whether the appellants would be eligible for the higher norms fixed by Ministry in respect of wastage/ loss/ breakage of raw materials and as to whether the demand is premature. On going […]

Appellant entitled to refund of CENVAT credit held to be admissible which was earlier reversed at the instance of Dept.

January 27, 2022 756 Views 0 comment Print

Agasti SSK Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Nashik (CESTAT Mumbai) Brief background of this case is that CENVAT credit taken against manufacture of bagasse and press mud during sugar manufacturing process but was reversed at the instance of the Deptt was held to be admissible by the Commissioner (Appeals) in his […]

Redevelopment of society : Service Tax on flats handed over to existing members of societies without any consideration

January 27, 2022 7299 Views 0 comment Print

Commissioner of CGST & C.Ex. Vs Ethics Infra Development Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai) In the present case the respondent has discharged the complete service tax liability on the gross amount received by him for providing the taxable services. Once he have discharged the tax liability on the gross consideration received by him by the sale […]

CESTAT directs Re-determination of Service Tax on Renting of Stall to Hawkers by Municipality

January 17, 2022 2724 Views 0 comment Print

Mira Bhaindar Municipal Corporation Vs Commissioner of CGST & Cen. Excise, Thane (CESTAT Mumbai) The crux of the submissions made by the appellant who is a  Municipal Corporation is that  these services (Ground rent market/ sports ground rent, Permitted Stall ground Rent, BOT Lease Rent, Blood bank and Mandap Services)  rendered by them are mandated […]

No Service Tax payable in absence of clauses pertaining to Consideration in Contract

January 13, 2022 2388 Views 0 comment Print

B.G. Exploration & Production India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Mumbai) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal observed that allowed appeals on the ground that consideration cannot be deciphered out from any clauses of the Contract and without consideration Service Tax cannot be demanded. Facts: The issue involved in these […]

Cenvat credit cannot be reversed for theoretical variance in Inputs

December 30, 2021 2175 Views 0 comment Print

Tata Motors Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) We find that in the facts and circumstances of the present case the shortages and excesses if any found are theoretical due to huge quantity of inputs handling. It is not a case of the Department that the appellant have ever removed any Cenvat inputs […]

Duty cannot be demanded for mere shifting of goods to another premise by 100% EOU-importer

December 30, 2021 1731 Views 0 comment Print

Power Weave Software Services P. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein duty has been demanded from the appellant for import of the goods being 100% EOU, who obtained permission from Software Technology Parks of India (STPI in short) and goods were also liable […]

Refund claim allowed despite non-filing of ST-3 return for claim period

December 1, 2021 3483 Views 0 comment Print

Blue River Capital India Advisory Services LLP Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) Facts- Refund claim filed by the appellant is rejected on various grounds like- -For the refund claim period no ST-3 return was filed. -Services allegedly exported by the appellant were not used outside India. -Some input tax credit invoices […]

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930