Commissioner of Customs vs Gamesa Wind Turbine – CESTAT Chennai rules flanges integral to Wind Operated Electric Generators, qualifying for excise duty exemption.
Explore the implications of the Priyanka Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Customs case as per the detailed CESTAT Chennai order dated 25.01.2024.
CESTAT Chennai held that the advertising materials like glow sign boards, flex printing, broachers, stickers, tags, posters, hand bills, signages, etc., which cater to the requirements of the specific customers, on which VAT is paid, is not leviable to Service Tax.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Chennai order favoring Acer India’s video projectors’ classification, granting customs exemption. Analysis and details provided.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that the assessee is entitled to cenvat credit of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on the services received from Foreign Service provider prior to 18.04.2006.
CESTAT Chennai held that DGCEI officers are Central Excise Officers as they have been vested with the powers are fully competent to issue Show Cause Notice demanding service tax on reverse charge.
Huge loss as Kiwi fruit re-export order delayed; CESTAT Chennai reduces redemption fine in Ram Prasath vs Commissioner of Customs case. Full text of CESTAT Chennai order.
CESTAT Chennai rules against service tax on ONGC’s royalty payments for petroleum licenses, affirming royalty as a regulatory fee, not service consideration, offering clarity on tax implications of such payments.
Learn how CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of Petrotech Products India Pvt Ltd, emphasizing procedural fairness in Cenvat refund denial. Full analysis here.
Explore the CESTAT Chennai order on Usha International vs Commissioner of Customs. Analysis of mis-declaration, penalties, and the quashing of redemption fine.
