CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Reliance Industries, stating ship demurrage charges are not part of imported goods’ transaction value. Full analysis of C.C. Ahmedabad vs. Reliance Industries Limited.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Kalp Corporation vs. C.C.E. & S.T. regarding penalty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act for delayed payment of excise duty and utilization of CENVAT credit.
CESTAT Ahmedabad quashes Central Excise duty demand on petroleum fuels extraction, citing absence of a speaking order. Detailed analysis and implications.
CESTAT Ahmedabad allows CENVAT credit for the supplier of Rotogravure Printing Cylinders who had paid excise duty correctly. In-depth analysis of the case.
Read the CESTAT Ahmedabad’s order in Vidyut Corporation vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman, where excise duty demands, interest, and penalties are deemed unsustainable due to a mere wrong mention of registration in payment.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules on CENVAT credit eligibility. Intas Pharmaceuticals allowed to claim credit based on law at service receipt, not credit availing date.
Explore CESTAT Ahmedabad’s decision in Archna Traders vs. C.C.E. & S.T. on denial of VCES Scheme benefit under Section 106 of Finance Act 2013. Full analysis here.
Legal battle between Ambica Engineering Works and C.C.E. & S.T. in light of alleged misapplication of Exemption Notification No. 6/2022-CE and penalty imposed under Rule 25 and Section 11AC.
The CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Sabic Innovative Plastics India Pvt Ltd, allowing CENVAT credit for Management Consultancy Services and halting enforcement of demand notice.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s verdict on C.C.E. & S.T vs. Shreno Limited case regarding excise duty demand under Rule 6(3) of CCR when CENVAT credit is reversed on common input services for exempted steam.
