Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore’s significant order favoring Saritha Jain against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2013-14, covering various grounds challenging income tax assessment.
ITAT Bangalore held that the provisions of section 68 of the Income Tax Act cannot be applied in relation to the sales receipt of preference shares shown by the assessee in its books of accounts as sales receipt has already been shown in the books of accounts as income/loss at the time of sale only.
ITAT Bangalore directs re-evaluation of ex-parte assessment order on alleged bogus purchases by Kalu Singh. Detailed analysis and implications of the decision.
Explore the ITAT Bangalore order in the case of I&B Seeds Pvt Ltd vs ACIT, directing re-adjudication on the claimed depreciation for goodwill arising from a slump sale.
Read ITAT decision on the eligibility of a cooperative society for a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The case, Keyyur Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs ITO, addresses interest income on investments in a cooperative bank without a banking license.
Assessee had shown sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeals before the Tribunal as he was old and not well acquainted and conversant with the digital system in order to follow up with the income tax notices, which were posted in IT portal. Accordingly, the delay in filing appeal was condoned.
ITAT Bangalore upholds disallowance of belated ESI & Provident Fund payments in Balmatta Diagnostic & Research Centre case. Portal glitches lead to delay, but disallowance confirmed.
Explore the Expat Engineering India Ltd. vs ACIT case regarding interest on late TDS payment. Understand the arguments, tribunal decision, and implications
Deduction under Section 57 was allowable on the cost of funds and proportionate administrative expenses for earning interest income to the extent of Rs.9,05,550/-.
ITAT Bangalore held that initiation of proceedings against the person other than the searched person under section 148, instead of section 153C, of the Income Tax Act is without any jurisdiction and hence held liable to be set aside.
