Analysis of the case DCIT vs. KCJ Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) reveals jurisdictional errors due to the company’s strike off from ROC records.
Sanjeev Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) – CIT(A) can admit additional evidence after giving full opportunity to AO to rebut/offer comments in remand proceeding.
Whether interest retained by NBFCs on assets purchased by SBI falls under categories of interest, fees for professional/technical services, or commission/brokerage?
ITAT Ahmedabad allows a bank’s loss on the sale of government securities and depreciation, citing regulatory compliance and business activity.
Issuance Of Letters Of Comfort/Support will Construe As International Transaction U/s 92B considering corporate guarantee issued by assessee could not be compared with the letters of comfort and therefore agreed with the computation of arm’s length rate of 0.04%.
Discover the Madras High Court’s verdict on tax dispute stay applications. Learn how the ruling impacts taxpayers and legal proceedings. Full judgment insights.
ITAT Delhi deletes Rs. 89.7 Lakhs addition u/s 68 IT Act in ACIT vs. Daya Rani. Detailed analysis of taxpayer’s explanation for capital enhancement.
ITAT upholds disallowance of expenses incurred by Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. on gifts, travel facilities, and sponsorships for doctors in accordance with the Supreme Court’s ruling and the CBDT circular.
ITAT held that time limit for filing rectification applications starts only when assessee is aware of order passed, not from date of order itself. Since there was no proof of intimation being served on assessee, time-barred argument by tax authorities was dismissed.
Rajendra Kumar Mishra vs. ACIT case: ITAT Kolkata directs re-evaluation as AO misinterpreted PCIT’s orders on loan payments.