The Gauhati High Court directed the restoration of a canceled GST registration, allowing revival upon filing returns and clearing dues under Rule 23 of CGST Rules.
The Gauhati High Court directed the revocation of a GST registration cancellation, allowing restoration upon payment of dues. The order aligns with past precedents.
The Gauhati High Court set aside a GST registration cancellation order, ruling it lacked reasoning and due process, impacting the petitioner’s business operations.
Delhi High Court sets aside ₹14.63 crore penalty on Property Plus Realtors, ruling the order was issued beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 275(1)(c).
Delhi High Court dismisses appeal in PCIT vs Thapar Homes Ltd, ruling penalty under Section 271E was time-barred under Section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
The Bombay High Court quashed a CBDT order denying tax benefits to Tata Autocomp Gotion Green Energy, citing violations of natural justice principles.
Madhya Pradesh High Court rules in favor of Global Exim, affirming DFIA benefits for importers. The decision aligns with past judicial precedents on duty-free imports.
After pronouncement of the Judgment of this Court, the petitioner stopped paying IGST on ocean freight in respect of the CIF contracts and also claimed the refund of the IGST already paid on the ocean freight on the basis of the said Judgment.
In Seth Banarsi Dass Gupta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, it is held that the High Court within whose jurisdiction the AO has passed the assessment order would have the jurisdiction to entertain the appeal under Section 260A of the Act.
Delhi High Court held that approval accorded in terms of section 153D of the Income Tax Act in a mechanical manner without application of mind is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed and assessment order quashed.
